Research collected from outside sources and what this site derives from them; every fact links to a saved copy of its source Research or story?

Stakeholders / Everyone with PHP in the path / The PHP project

The PHP project: its risk register

The people who write, fix and release PHP: the PHP Group, the PHP Foundation, the security team and the fix authors.

Kind group · Assigned here 3 · In its register 11 · in the story as The PHP Group / php.net, The PHP Foundation

The register

Assigned here, or arriving through a part of this stakeholder. The part played is the one recorded for whoever holds the assignment.

RiskRatingKindPart playedControls
R02 The coordinated disclosure broke before the fix was ready20 criticalDisclosure processthrough The PHP security team (owner)ISO/IEC 29147 and 30111 29147:coordination, NIS2 Art.12, NIST CSF 2.0 ID.RA-08, FIRST TLP 2.0 TLP:AMBER+STRICT
R02-1 The CVE IDs and the proof-of-concept video circulated before release20 criticalDisclosure processthrough The PHP security team (owner)ISO/IEC 29147 and 30111 29147:coordination, NIST CSF 2.0 ID.RA-08
R08 Frontier AI finds critical flaws faster than maintainers can fix them20 criticalStrategicbearerEU AI Act Art.55, NIST AI RMF GOVERN-6.1, NIST AI RMF MEASURE-2.7, ISO/IEC 42001 6.1.2
R02-3 Patched builds published before the embargo lifted16 highSupply chainthrough The PHP security team (regulator)ISO/IEC 29147 and 30111 29147:coordination, Cyber Resilience Act Art.13, NIST CSF 2.0 GV.SC-05, OWASP Top 10s A03:2025
R08-1 A known bug left unexploited, then unfixed, for two years16 highStrategicownerNIST SSDF PW.7, NIST SSDF RV.2, Cyber Resilience Act Art.24, ISO/IEC 27001 A.8.25
R01 Remote code execution on internet-facing PHP servers15 highSecuritytreaterISO/IEC 27001 A.8.8, NIST CSF 2.0 ID.RA-01, NIST SP 800-53 SI-2, CIS Controls 7.7 +3
R01-4 The fix is incomplete, or a third flaw follows15 highSecuritythrough The fix authors (owner), The PHP security team (treater)NIST SSDF RV.3, NIST SSDF PW.8, ISO/IEC 27001 A.8.29, ISO/IEC 29147 and 30111 30111:handling
R01-2 PHP-FPM deployments wrongly treated as safe or as certainly vulnerable12 highSecuritythrough The PHP security team (informer)NIST CSF 2.0 ID.RA-01, ISO/IEC 27001 6.1.2
R06-3 Manufacturers under the Cyber Resilience Act owe a 24-hour report12 highCompliancethrough The PHP Foundation (informer)Cyber Resilience Act Art.14, Cyber Resilience Act Art.13, Cyber Resilience Act Art.24, Cyber Resilience Act AnnexI.II
R08-2 Several finders, one small team12 highOperationalthrough The PHP security team (bearer), The PHP Foundation (owner)ISO/IEC 29147 and 30111 29147:receipt, NIST CSF 2.0 ID.RA-08, NIST SSDF RV.1
R02-2 Early mitigation advice to a few providers leaked9 mediumDisclosure processthrough The PHP security team (owner)FIRST TLP 2.0 TLP:AMBER+STRICT, ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.14, ISO/IEC 29147 and 30111 29147:coordination

Where its risks sit

Likelihood / impact1 Minor2 Moderate3 Significant4 Major5 Severe
5 Happening5 10 15 20 R02 R02-125
4 Likely4 8 12 R08-216 R02-3 R08-120 R08
3 Possible3 6 9 R02-212 R01-2 R06-315 R01 R01-4
2 Unlikely2 4 6 8 10
1 Rare1 2 3 4 5

Its parts

Who it shares risks with

Organisations running PHP (1), People who use PHP services (1), Hosting and cloud providers (1), Edge, WAF and detection vendors (1), Agencies and CERTs (1), OpenAI (Patch the Planet) (1), The finders (1), Everyone with PHP in the path (1), CISO (1), Quarkslab and OSTIF (1), The PHP Foundation (1)

The standards its register touches

ISO/IEC 27001 (5), NIST SSDF (5), Cyber Resilience Act (4), NIST CSF 2.0 (3), ISO/IEC 29147 and 30111 (3), OWASP Top 10s (2), NIS2 (2), NIST AI RMF (2), NIST SP 800-53 (1), CIS Controls (1), MITRE ATT&CK (1), FIRST TLP 2.0 (1), EU AI Act (1), ISO/IEC 42001 (1)